On Lunatics and Losers in the Right

Here follows Greg Johnson’s comments on Frazier Glenn Miller and his links to VNN forum concerning the  individuals that inhabit its virtual space. And yes, I do know Bill doesn’t like Greg Johnson – but this article is worth spreading around. Much of what Johnson calls the ‘Old Right’ is just a bunch of pansies moaning on the internet about how oppressed they are by people they claim to be inferior. How can the inferior oppress the superior? It cannot – therefore these ‘pansies’ are the weakest dregs of the Caucasian race.

Since these individuals are too stupid/insane to ever be taken seriously, they have no choice but to become a menace to society. The ‘Pansy Division’ of the ‘Old Right’ does not even belong on the ‘Right’ – only the Liberal Left supports ‘equality’ for the intellectually handicapped and the mentally ill. And what is this Miller lackspittle, but a creature so weak and cowardly as to attack unarmed civilians? A warrior? A spineless coward and a brainless imbecile.

Let us blame the real culprit – Liberal Democracy – that permits dangerous imbeciles to run free. I outright condemn Millers actions and believe he should be subjected to utter posthumous humiliation to discourage further fools from such actions and bring disgrace on Nationalist movements.

Please read Johnson’s article below:

What is the Old Right response to this strategic situation? Based on Alex Linder’s Vanguard News Network Forum, which Glenn Miller frequented, the Old Right approach is to drop our strongest weapons (particularly morality), to put together a cadre of people who are even more repulsive and crazy than the enemy leadership, and then to charge the enemy at his strongest point.[1]

Old Right types typically accuse me of bringing a pen to a gunfight, but I accuse them of bringing a gun to a battle of ideas. Glenn Miller shows us how well that works out.

Note

1. Linder, who has never heard of a spree killer he hasn’t liked, has been silent since Miller’s rampage. Some are speculating that the SPLC will use Miller’s connection to VNN to try to shut down Linder’s tard hatchery. But this is wishful thinking. Why would the system shut down VNN Forum when Miller’s actions work entirely to the system’s advantage? Objectively, VNN Forum is an enemy asset. If I were them, I would be donating to it.

 

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/04/on-the-necessity-of-a-new-right/

 

Florida Trial – The Return of the Facebook Profile?

 

If the Roanoke trial ever finishes, the Florida trial is still looming around the corner. As of yet, no one knows anything about what this one involves, except for some spurious anonymous emails and posts on forums which haven’t been presented yet.

However, I’m strongly expecting the Facebook page to return again from the dead and haunt Bill, so those of you who were unlucky enough to be connected to it, you will  be featuring in the next trial too. I’m expecting to see some new faces appear also.

The Facebook page, regardless of who wrote it, is full of crap. There is no other way to say this.  So I want you to pay special attention to the fact that I am saying whoever or whatever made the posts that shall be appearing soon, clearly had no intent or no capability to back them up.

The key point to remember is that internet content gets accorded with more credibility than what it is worth, because of the confusion between reality and fiction that becomes blurred during internet statements. What is fictional, is taken as factual, independent of any arising or connected events.

There were 54 people connected to the Facebook profile in question – only 54. Most of these were also fake accounts from Anti-Fascist Activists and informants, so we can slash that down to probably twenty real people. Out of that twenty there are only roughly ten in the United States. So who exactly was supposed to be carrying out the threats he is accused of?

From what I saw on that Facebook page Bill’s (if it was Bill) only real contacts in the US were an old woman and the informant from the Roanoke case. God knows who the morons are that will be accused of being Bill White’s Florida stooge, because as far as I can see there is no one who could be involved, bar the old woman and the informant (both of which seem unrealistic possibilities). Given that half of the pages contacts are AFA or informants, the prospect that one of them did post items should not be ruled out however.

Real and credible threats to national security do not rant online, nor do they type “hey look at my FB profile come on over and please arrest me/shoot me in the head” across the internet. That’s an entirely different issue to criminal behaviour. If those posts were made by Bill White, he needs a psychologist not prison. Either that or he didn’t make them.

 

 

Facebook Trouble Maker with Multiple Identities Connected to the ‘Fake Bill White’ Page.

Who or what maintained the the now infamous ‘Bill White’ (and I use this term loosely) profile on Facebook remains a mystery – but one interesting thing surfaces – I recall seeing this person on the page, who has been banned from just about everywhere for acting like a lunatic and seems to be being called both a hacker and an informant by a lot of people, ranging from these people to the head of the Asatru Folk Federation (who is a very respectable person).

No one really knows who this person is due to the multiple pseudonyms deployed, but ‘It’ is almost universally recognised as a ‘sinister online presence’ and I doubt his/her/it’s presence on the FB profile was coincidental.

Seana Elizabeth Fenner von Fenneberg aka Amber Clausson

The Facebook Comment That Ruined a Life

Another sad case of people being arrested purely for bad jokes/ranting on the internet.

“If they’re spending their time chasing around people like Justin Carter, I hope they’re not missing the real dangers to society, the real school shooters,” Flanary says. “There’s only a finite number of police, and if they’re chasing around guys who are being mean on Facebook, where are the ones fighting crime?” (Quoting article).

What I wish to draw attention to here is the fact that this problem is not limited to ‘political activists’ (though obviously because they are public figures, they become easier targets). The truth is that people are being arrested for victimless crimes – i.e. talking shit on the internet, which never amounts to anything further and obviously is never going to.

Concentrating on people talking shit on the internet draws attention away from the real problems and is a waste of legal resources. Like the man in this case above, it can happen to anyone.

The punishment outweighs the crime and is disproportional.

Talking shit on the internet is more dangerous than actually committing a crime because of the absurdity attributed to thought over deed – which of course was the premise behind Orwell’s 1984 and the concept of Big Brother/Thoughtcrime. Meanwhile, the real criminals who probably have the intelligence not to discuss such things over the internet reign free – legal resources are wasted elsewhere, such as on this Justin Carter person who was quite obviously just talking bullshit.

The key point here is this is now a problem for everyday citizens.

Article below:

http://www.dallasobserver.com/2014-02-13/news/the-facebook-comment-that-ruined-a-life/full/

The Gentlepersons Guide to Forum Spies

Since this site is a hot target for all kinds of general malicious web users, I thought I’d re-post this excerpt from ‘The Gentleperson’s Guide to Forum Spies’ for those of you who can’t recognise them on other forums, this will be of some use.

How to Spot a Spy 

One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a group that does all the wrong things. Why?

1) The message doesn’t get out.
2) A lot of time is wasted
3) The activist is frustrated and discouraged
4) Nothing good is accomplished.

Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:

1) To disrupt the agenda
2) To side-track the discussion
3) To interrupt repeatedly
4) To feign ignorance
5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.

Saboteurs

Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ….

1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)
2) Print flyers in English only.
3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.
4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support
5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.
6) Confuse issues.
7) Make the wrong demands.
Cool Compromise the goal.
9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone’s time.

Provocateurs

1) Want to establish “leaders” to set them up for a fall in order to stop the movement.
2) Suggest doing foolish, illegal things to get the activists in trouble.
3) Encourage militancy.
4) Want to taunt the authorities.
5) Attempt to make the activist compromise their values.
6) Attempt to instigate violence. Activisim ought to always be non-violent.
7) Attempt to provoke revolt among people who are ill-prepared to deal with the reaction of the authorities to such violence.

Informants

1) Want everyone to sign up and sing in and sign everything.
2) Ask a lot of questions (gathering data).
3) Want to know what events the activist is planning to attend.
4) Attempt to make the activist defend him or herself to identify his or her beliefs, goals, and level of committment.

Surveillance

ALWAYS assume that you are under surveillance.

At this point, if you are NOT under surveillance, you are not a very good activist!

Scare Tactics

Such tactics include slander, defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant false information and set up “exposure,” they will send incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and more; they will do whatever society will allow.

This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.

Original online at: http://hongpong.com/archives/2012/07/16/gentlepersons-guide-forum-spies-decoding-astroturfing-malicious-forum-internet-o