Malpractice Evidence in Court Transcript?


From a letter to Harold Covington, Bill on why posting a transcript upsets the prosecution:

This is why the dictatorship is so upset that the trial transcript and material on their star witness [name redacted] has been posted online. Of course, it is impossible for me to have posted this online because I’m in prison. But more importantly, there is nothing even colorably wrong with posting a trial transcript, supposedly a matter of public record, online. If the trial transcript tended to make me look guilty, would the regime be complaining about it? This is the irony of the situation–making public the evidence used to convict me is, in the mind of the dictatorship, “disrespectful” and “obstructive of justice.”


It doesn’t take a genius to figure that posting a court transcript of someone who is supposedly guilty should be a good thing for the legal system. They should be rejoicing that evidence of Bill White’s guilt is online!

And yet this is not so. They are complaining that a document which was made to attest to his guilt is online. Since according to them, it is proof of his guilt, it should not be a problem.

But apparently it is – because if you read the actual thing there so many gaping holes in it, it looks like a block of swiss cheese on a firing range. Even I did not believe Bill’s stories about how his wife psychologically abused him – until I read the court transcript, which is just sitting there, proudly displayed for all the world to see.

The parts of the transcript I blacked out contains the names and conversations of people who would have been witnesses for the defense if they were contacted. They were not contacted – their names and conversations are used here, and without their knowledge or consent. I spoke to one of them yesterday, and he was so unaware of the entire event he did not even know Bill was in prison!

Why were these people never contacted and cited in the transcript, without being aware of their participation or even questioned?!



Jury Trial – Day 3 (Part 1 of 1

)Jury Trial – Day 2 (Part 2 of 2)

Jury Trial – Day 2 (Part 1 of 2)

Jury Trial – Day 1 (Part 1 of 1)

On Lunatics and Losers in the Right

Glenn Frazier Miller, Idiot, ImbecileHere follows Greg Johnson’s comments on Frazier Glenn Miller and his links to VNN forum concerning the  individuals that inhabit its virtual space. And yes, I do know Bill doesn’t like Greg Johnson – but this article is worth spreading around. Much of what Johnson calls the ‘Old Right’ is just a bunch of pansies moaning on the internet about how oppressed they are by people they claim to be inferior. How can the inferior oppress the superior? It cannot – therefore these ‘pansies’ are the weakest dregs of the Caucasian race.

Since these individuals are too stupid/insane to ever be taken seriously, they have no choice but to become a menace to society. The ‘Pansy Division’ of the ‘Old Right’ does not even belong on the ‘Right’ – only the Liberal Left supports ‘equality’ for the intellectually handicapped and the mentally ill. And what is this Miller lackspittle, but a creature so weak and cowardly as to attack unarmed civilians? A warrior? A spineless coward and a brainless imbecile.

Let us blame the real culprit – Liberal Democracy – that permits dangerous imbeciles to run free. I outright condemn Millers actions and believe he should be subjected to utter posthumous humiliation to discourage further fools from such actions and bring disgrace on Nationalist movements.

Please read Johnson’s article below:

What is the Old Right response to this strategic situation? Based on Alex Linder’s Vanguard News Network Forum, which Glenn Miller frequented, the Old Right approach is to drop our strongest weapons (particularly morality), to put together a cadre of people who are even more repulsive and crazy than the enemy leadership, and then to charge the enemy at his strongest point.[1]

Old Right types typically accuse me of bringing a pen to a gunfight, but I accuse them of bringing a gun to a battle of ideas. Glenn Miller shows us how well that works out.


1. Linder, who has never heard of a spree killer he hasn’t liked, has been silent since Miller’s rampage. Some are speculating that the SPLC will use Miller’s connection to VNN to try to shut down Linder’s tard hatchery. But this is wishful thinking. Why would the system shut down VNN Forum when Miller’s actions work entirely to the system’s advantage? Objectively, VNN Forum is an enemy asset. If I were them, I would be donating to it.